|
The illustrations on today's page come form an international children's poster competition. Many countries produced impressive contributions, more of which can be found on the official United Nations summit website.
Biotech contradictions Thursday 29 August Today I tried to attend the youth meeting at Nasrec but problems with buses and I only got there at 10am and had missed it. Still I got told that my job was to go to the commission on Biotechnology and GMO’s. Luckily that was the one I wanted to go to! Before going I had a look on the Eco-Village Network stall and had a good chat with some blokes who live in eco-villages (one in LA and one in Scotland). The bloke from Scotland had heard of Woodcraft, and I said it would be good to make links to maybe organise trips to visit Eco-villages for educational purposes. (I also decided that I’m going to live in one when I grow up!) Ok, to the biotech. Commission. On the panel was Vandana Shiva (well known activist and writer from India – advocating for non-violent protest against the monopoly of multinationals and against the biotechnology industry amongst other things! P.s. read her stuff she’s great!). Also Silvia from Mexico, a representative from an African farmers union and a Canadian farmer who had been the mayor of his town. These were all arguing against GMOs and Monsanto’s domination. For the first time I have seen in a commission the panel was geographically balanced. Then also there was a scientist from Norway who was arguing that people should be able to choose and that scientific studies need to be done on specific areas and specific GM seeds before GE is completely written off. (So the representation of viewpoints on the panel was not balanced). I will try to get hold of the minutes (proving hard so far) but if not I will have to write up my notes because it was a very interesting discussion. The main issue that came out was that there were a considerable number of farmers whose argument was that their traditional local seed varieties did not feed them. They are HUNGRY and if Monsanto can offer them food they must have the right to choose whether it is beneficial to them or not. They were getting really angry with the panel and other floor speakers. For me it seemed clear that biotechnology is all about control – especially seeing as there is only 5 companies who control the entire GM food industry (Silvia –sorry didn’t get her surname!), selling seeds, seeds which only work with pesticides from this company, buying the food back from the farmers and then selling it at a price in the West which is too high for these small farmers to be able to buy back in order to feed themselves. The farmer from Canada had also had really bad experiences with Monsanto who took him to court because they found a GM variety in the ditch next to his field. (Read minutes if I get them!)
What also came out was that it is about the capacity of governments to stand up to the biotechnology companies and defend poor farmers, offer them support and independent scientific research about GM. I put a question in writing to the panel (it didn’t get addressed) that was “Do you think the way to empower governments to stand up to MNCs is through international dialogues and legislation? Eg the UN WSSD process. If so, how can we as the Civil Sociey Forum influence the decisions and draftings at the UN summit?" This is a theme which I have been coming across a lot, in the youth meetings, and also the forum here in NASREC as a whole is concerned about this. There was actually a meeting today about how we can influence the WSSD process as civil society but I missed it as it was during the bio-tech commission! love Rhino
Meanwhile, at NASREC: R A
|
The delegation would love to help feed your views into the Summit. The links below take you to a number of the douments which are currently being drawn up by the Youth Caucus. Please e-mail the delegation with your views on these.
Glossary of Summit-speak Confused by all the strange terminology and acronyms... We hope the glossary below will help:
|