FACT:
Bolivia is one of the poorest countries in
Latin America with and the highest child mortality rates on the continent.
The country has to spend half of all its (legal) export income on paying
its debt. 40% of Bolivia's workforce depend on the drugs trade for a living.
FACT:
It is the world's largest debtors who are chopping down their forests
the fastest. Brazil is the world's largest deforester and one of its largest
debtors, owing US$112 billion. It is cutting a staggering 50,000 sq km
of forest every year - largely to service its debt.
What is
the debt crisis?
Some developing countries are practically bankrupt. They owe foreign creditors
so much money that just paying the interest means their governments can't
afford primary education, basic health or clean water. Some don't even
earn enough foreign currency from exports to pay the annual interest repayments
due on their debts.
How did
the problem start?
All countries borrow overseas at some point. If the money is invested
to increase the capacity of the economy, more foreign debt is not a long-term
problem. Unfortunately many developing countries borrowed too much and
invested it badly in the 1970s and 1980s, often encouraged by Western
governments.
When did
they start getting into trouble?
The
economic environment started turning against developing countries when
oil price rises hit. Then, a slow down in growth in the West cut into
their markets, while prices for their major exports dropped. Some countries
were governed by corrupt elites who siphoned off foreign dollars into
their own personal accounts. The result was that their economies grew
too slowly to service their debts, while interest rates rose. Developing
countries who owed rich countries US$600 billion in 1980, now owe US$2500
billion.
If anyone
takes a loan shouldn't they repay it? Why should any debts be cancelled?
Many of these debts have already been paid many times over in local currencies.
Between 1981 and 1997 the less developed countries paid over US$2.9 trillion
in interest and principal payments. This is double what they received
in new loans. For each $1 that industrialized countries provide in grants,
developing countries pay back $13 in debt servicing. We don't expect people
in Australia who go bankrupt to sacrifice the health and education of
their children to keep paying their debts. And yet, we continue to allow
millions of children in poor countries to die each year of preventable
causes while their governments are forced to repay loans to rich creditors.
Women are
also forced to bear an unfair burden of the debt crisis, making up for
the loss of government services in health and education through unpaid
work. Consider too, the dramatic changes since the original loans were
made. Borrowers had no control over skyrocketing rates of interest and
plummeting commodity prices. Responsibility for loans has rested with
borrowers, allowing lenders to carelessly provide large loans to corrupt
political leaders. Ordinary people have mainly borne the cost of repaying
loans, with no say in the borrowing or spending of the money.
Which
countries are most in debt and how much do they owe?
Japan is the world's biggest debtor but there is no serious prospect of
it defaulting on its loans. Most of the countries who are in the worst
trouble are extremely poor African countries. In 1980 sub-Saharan Africa
owed US$84.1 billion. Today it owes US$222 billion - 71 per cent of its
annual output.
To whom
do the poorest countries owe money?
Most is owed to foreign governments and multilateral financial institutions
like the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and the World Bank. A smaller
amount is owed to commercial banks.
How has
the problem been tackled over the past 25 years?
Lenders thought giving poor countries more time to pay would solve the
problem, but eventually realized some nations were never going to be able
to repay their debts. In 1988, the Paris Club (which represents main lender
countries), agreed to cut the debt burdens of the most severely affected
countries by 33 per cent. By 1994 they had raised this to 67 per cent.
US$300 billion worth of debt has been rescheduled over the last 2 decades.
The Brady Plan has also proved effective in clearing up bad loans from
the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s. However this did not work
for many sub-Saharan African and some Asian and Latin American countries
which still owe too much to be able to service their debts.
What else
was tried?
Iin 1996 the World Bank and the IMF developed a new approach. Under the
Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, all creditors agreed
to jointly reduce the debt burdens of the worst affected countries to
a "sustainable" level where debt repayments are less than 20-25
per cent of export earnings.
Who has
benefited so far?
The World Bank identified 41 countries potentially needing debt relief
under the HIPC Initiative. Uganda was the first country to receive agreement
to have its debt burden cut. Since then, Bolivia, Guyana and Mozambique
received some relief too. Burkina Faso, Mali, & Cote d'Ivoire now
have dates for their debts to be cut. But already, Uganda and Bolivia
again have levels of debts which are unsustainable.
Why is
it taking so long?
Though some progress has been made, the steps made by the G8 and the IMF
and World Bank are small and take many years to benefit the poorest in
heavily indebted countries. The time has come to take bigger strides in
releasing the poor from their burden of debt.
What else
can be done?
All eligible countries could at least be started on the process of receiving
debt relief under HIPC by the end of the year 2000. That would mean fast-tracking
some countries who haven't fulfilled their three years of economic reform.
But the HIPC Initiative isn't enough. It still leaves countries paying
too much on debt in a process that takes too long.
Why is
this debt unfair?
Mozambique spends ten times more on interest than on health care. Zambia
spends five times more on interest than on education. These and many other
countries are diverting money, which could be invested in eradicating
poverty, to pay interests on debts that are unpayable. They can never
hope to earn enough from exports and aid payments to repay all the interest
that has built up.
Will debt
relief really benefit the poor?
Debt relief linked to eradicating poverty will give millions of poor people
a chance to improve their lives. Without it, there is no real possibility
of eradicating poverty. Poor countries' governments cannot adequately
fund essential education, health or infrastructure to raise living standards.
Uncertainty created by debt deters foreign investors.
Won't
countries just get into debt again?
Steps need to be taken to prevent such a debt trap ever building up again.
Debtors and creditors should share responsibility for the terms of future
borrowing.
|